SAY Writing Competition
Banner courtesy of Adam Lowe, University of Tasmania
Rules
Contact Us
Books
Privacy
Payments
                   
   Voting Closed: September 30, 2004
   
   Is this the first reliable voting system on the Internet?    

   View All Voting Sheets Online   

   Prizes and certificates sent out: October 7, 2004

 
CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR CLEAR WINNER:
Entry No. 11, "My Burgeoning Waistline" by Tracey Coyle

In this unprecedented writing competition where readers determined the winners, we were delighted that there was a clear winner: Entry number 11, "My Burgeoning Waistline", received a total score of 626. Given that only 12 readers/writers cast their votes, and that the score was significantly greater than the other scores, this was a reliable result and an incredible success for this entry. While we strongly encouraged writers to cast their votes, it should be noted that this writer was not among the voters. Passwords allocated to this writer remain unused, i.e. the score did not include any self-votes.

First place: Entry no. 11, Total score: 626
"My Burgeoning Waistline" by Tracey Coyle, South Frankston, VIC
(Also the top paid-entry, winner of $2,400)
Second place: Entry no. 9, Total score: 385
"Wrong Again?" by Josette Ackad, Bankstown, NSW
Third place: Entry no. 56, Total score: 360
"Dear God" by Suyin Toh, Singapore, Singapore

Top paid-entries:
1. Entry no. 11, Total score: 626
"My Burgeoning Waistline" by Tracey Coyle, South Frankston, VIC ($2,400)
2. Entry no. 53, Total score: 350
"When My Life is Over" by Lani Nielsen, Ipswich, QLD ($1,000)
3. Entry no. 18, Total score: 341
"I Opened the Refrigerator" by Benjamin John Lee, Castle Hill, NSW ($600)

Voter's prize: Bram Keller, Spearwood WA ($1,000)

All voting sheets can be viewed below. Apart from the top winning entry, other scores were not significantly different, largely because of the small number of votes received.
 

"I was impressed by the fact that the winning entry is witty and well-written... The fact that the winner's score in your competition was so far ahead of the rest is a good sign, especially as it was chosen by a group of readers rather than a single judge. Congratulations on running a successful competition." - Peter Hanbury

Peter Hanbury won over 50 first prizes in literary competitions around the world and was often called on to act as a judge. He taught creative writing and also ran short story and poetry workshops. We were proud to be able to consult him when needed, and we immensely appreciated his selfless help in countless ways.
Peter Hanbury died on Monday, 28 July 2008.
Rest in Peace, Peter.  

"You have sown the seeds of an original and challenging idea which will benefit all writers and readers worldwide" - John H. Reid

John H. Reid is the organizer and judge of the Tom Howard Short Story and Poetry Contests. He is also the author of the book, "How To Win Writing Contests", and the editor of the Writers’ Resources / Contests category at The Open Directory. John H. Reid can be contacted via: http://shortstorycontest.0catch.com/

 
Is this the first reliable voting system on the Internet?

The SAY writing competition was organised to test a new, Internet-based system. We strived to bring solutions to every applicable question in literature such as "How do I know if my votes counted?", "How do I know if votes were not tempered with?" and "What if someone submits multiple voting sheets?" 

To ensure credible and traceable results, passwords were allocated to books, to be entered as the "Book code" on the voting sheet. Also, all voting sheets were made available online (protecting the voter's identity due to privacy laws, but displaying the user number, which can be found at the bottom of your confirmation email.)

If you have any suggestions for improvement, or if you have any queries, please Contact Us.

 

All Voting Sheets Online

All voting sheets have been made available here, in the order of the voter's rank. The top-ranking voter has won the voter's prize of $1,000 as announced above. Due to the small number of votes received, functions such as Search or Simulate have not been provided.

User No        Rank
User 522      100% Total Variance: 28
User 531      100% Total Variance: 49
User 101      100% Total Variance: 58
User 303       80%
User 513       80%
User 041       80%
User 428       80%
User 297       70%
User 437       70%
User 560       70%
User 045       70%
User 512       60%


Entries with an average score of 80-99 were in the top-group, 60-79 in the average-group, and the rest in the low-group.

Click to enlarge
Click to see enlarged picture
This paperback book contains the 141 entries in the SAY Writing Competition. It is AU$20 or US$14 including postage anywhere in the world.

Click here to Buy Now

There are all types of entries that will make you laugh, cry and think. There are entries for children, teenagers and adults; entries that are conservative or activist, fiction or non-fiction in the form of short stories, essays and poems from North America, Australia, Europe, Asia and Africa.

Farewell!
The SAY Writing Competition was organised as a pilot study to test a new, Internet-based system where everything is open and fair, everyone is given a chance, and decisions are made by the people themselves. We gladly allocated great resources to this study, and obtained valuable data, observations and conclusions. If writers had demonstrated a need to utilise the unique features offered by this contest, we would have gone on supporting them for as long as they wanted. However, the overwhelming majority of the writers mistook this competition for a traditional one, submitting their entries and waiting for the results to be announced.

In the first few months of 2004 alone, we received hundreds of new entries. (Needless to say, all unpaid entries). Even when we offered to waive their entry fees in return for their votes, however, only one of them took up the offer (User no. 437, whose book purchase has since been refunded). Within the limited time the offer was announced at the site, this represented less than 1% participation, which clearly showed that going ahead for another year or two was not going to be any different.

We wish to express our gratitude to all who supported us, especially to Peter Hanbury, who will be sorely missed. Many thanks to each and every one of you who did participate, and also to those who did not. It was valuable data either way. All the best to all of you in the future. May all your dreams come true! 

                          Order Now      Rules    Contact Us